Quoted “He (Trump) has given every reason for Tokyo to fear that Washington will compromise their security by cutting a deal that doesn’t include short range missiles and that effectively acknowledges the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state.” —Richard Samuels June 8, 2018 Xinhua Net Fotini Christia's research featured in KellogInsight, “Why Certain Types of Elections Favor Extreme Candidates” June 7, 2018 KellogInsight “To capture the House, Democrats would have to see the biggest election swing [from presidential election to the next midterm election] in their favor in the entire post-World War II era.” —Charles Stewart III June 7, 2018 Li Zhou Vox M. Taylor Fravel discusses contentious issue for US-China relations with CNBC: “The U.S. is trying to stop China from doing something it's already doing.” June 1, 2018 CNBC “It is costless for Kim to say I am not going to do nuclear or missiles tests for now because frankly they are a stage in their cycle where they don’t need to.” —Vipin Narang May 31, 2018 Bloomberg News “Name change is also likely intended to signal support for the U.S. administration's ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy.’” —M. Taylor Fravel May 30, 2018 VOA “This is how progress is made, and the best chance to have a summit, and one that yields meaningful outcomes.” —Vipin Narang May 27, 2018 The Washington Post “Kim is clearly not going to give up his nuclear weapons...It’s not a great day for the US.” —Vipin Narang May 24, 2018 Financial Times “The North Koreans were prepared to ignore a lot of what the administration said before the summit, but it was the victory lap before the race that has really set them off.” —Vipin Narang May 17, 2018 The Guardian “I would prefer for us to answer these questions empirically, before just jumping in to pay the cost.” —Charles Stewart III May 15, 2018 HuffPost “Today is a stark reminder across the world: Deals are reversible and can have expiration dates, while nuclear weapons can offer lifetime insurance.” —Vipin Narang May 9, 2018 AFP - AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE - Online “If they ever saw a trident coming, they would have no idea what’s on it. And I think that's a really dangerous proposition, especially if your aim is to target assets deep in Russian territory. You’re buying yourself a strategic nuclear war potentially.” —Vipin Narang May 7, 2018 NPR Prof. Adam Berinsky’s research on correcting political misinformation is cited to help explain misinformation: “the messenger is as important as the medium.” May 4, 2018 The Washington Post “Denuclearization is a catch-all term that allows both sides to let it mean whatever they want it to mean...It creates a lot of trouble as you approach a summit, because both sides can have very different definitions or notions of what it means.” —Vipin Narang May 3, 2018 The Wall Street Journal “...the mile-wide gaps in the countries’ goals and even their understandings of basic terminology leaves ‘either lots of room for a bargain, or lot of room for a war.’” —Vipin Narang April 23, 2018 The New York Times “The big points aren’t new...It’s not much progress, in my opinion. Though many want to believe it is.” —Vipin Narang April 22, 2018 The Financial Times “This was a smart move by Kim...it still leaves a lot of wiggle room for circumventing the pledges in the future, and nothing in there is irreversible...nothing in there mentions denuclearization, of any variety.” —Vipin Narang April 21, 2018 CBS/AP “This is a very clever semantic pirouette,” he said, adding that just because North Korea had not explicitly asked for U.S. forces to leave did not mean that North Korea had not included that step as part of its demand for “ending hostilities.” —Vipin Narang April 19, 2018 Washington Post Prof. Andrea Campbell discusses the complications of the U.S. tax system with WaPo’s John Sides and the Brookings Institute’s Venessa Williamson. April 12, 2018 John Sides The Washingon Post “We are now beginning to change the narrative such that the families who have had that violence visited upon them now can talk about it and it be understood.” —Melissa Nobles April 9, 2018 Jim Axelrod CBS News “The danger is entering into negotiations with unrealistic expectations that Kim is just going to hand over the keys to his nuclear kingdom. He won’t.” —Vipin Narang April 9, 2018 Monkey Cage/Washington Post ‘Accountability without Democracy’ in the New York Times April 1, 2018 Alisa Zomer MIT GOV/LAB Prof. Suzanne Berger’s work cited in “What Economists Don’t Know About Manufacturing” March 29, 2018 William B. Bonvillian & Peter L. Singer The American Interest “Kim isn’t inviting Trump to relinquish his nuclear weapons. He’s inviting him to be treated as an equal to the United States of America—a goal sought by every Kim since North Korea began its nuclear program.” —Vipin Narang March 9, 2018 The New York Times ‘Accountability Without Democracy’ February 28, 2018 The New York Times Prof. Lily Tsai's book featured in NYTimes, helps us understand why China's once-resisted trend may be turning into deliberate practice. Pagination First page « First Previous page ‹ Previous … Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Current page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Next page Next › Last page Last »
“He (Trump) has given every reason for Tokyo to fear that Washington will compromise their security by cutting a deal that doesn’t include short range missiles and that effectively acknowledges the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state.” —Richard Samuels June 8, 2018 Xinhua Net
Fotini Christia's research featured in KellogInsight, “Why Certain Types of Elections Favor Extreme Candidates” June 7, 2018 KellogInsight
“To capture the House, Democrats would have to see the biggest election swing [from presidential election to the next midterm election] in their favor in the entire post-World War II era.” —Charles Stewart III June 7, 2018 Li Zhou Vox
M. Taylor Fravel discusses contentious issue for US-China relations with CNBC: “The U.S. is trying to stop China from doing something it's already doing.” June 1, 2018 CNBC
“It is costless for Kim to say I am not going to do nuclear or missiles tests for now because frankly they are a stage in their cycle where they don’t need to.” —Vipin Narang May 31, 2018 Bloomberg News
“Name change is also likely intended to signal support for the U.S. administration's ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy.’” —M. Taylor Fravel May 30, 2018 VOA
“This is how progress is made, and the best chance to have a summit, and one that yields meaningful outcomes.” —Vipin Narang May 27, 2018 The Washington Post
“Kim is clearly not going to give up his nuclear weapons...It’s not a great day for the US.” —Vipin Narang May 24, 2018 Financial Times
“The North Koreans were prepared to ignore a lot of what the administration said before the summit, but it was the victory lap before the race that has really set them off.” —Vipin Narang May 17, 2018 The Guardian
“I would prefer for us to answer these questions empirically, before just jumping in to pay the cost.” —Charles Stewart III May 15, 2018 HuffPost
“Today is a stark reminder across the world: Deals are reversible and can have expiration dates, while nuclear weapons can offer lifetime insurance.” —Vipin Narang May 9, 2018 AFP - AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE - Online
“If they ever saw a trident coming, they would have no idea what’s on it. And I think that's a really dangerous proposition, especially if your aim is to target assets deep in Russian territory. You’re buying yourself a strategic nuclear war potentially.” —Vipin Narang May 7, 2018 NPR
Prof. Adam Berinsky’s research on correcting political misinformation is cited to help explain misinformation: “the messenger is as important as the medium.” May 4, 2018 The Washington Post
“Denuclearization is a catch-all term that allows both sides to let it mean whatever they want it to mean...It creates a lot of trouble as you approach a summit, because both sides can have very different definitions or notions of what it means.” —Vipin Narang May 3, 2018 The Wall Street Journal
“...the mile-wide gaps in the countries’ goals and even their understandings of basic terminology leaves ‘either lots of room for a bargain, or lot of room for a war.’” —Vipin Narang April 23, 2018 The New York Times
“The big points aren’t new...It’s not much progress, in my opinion. Though many want to believe it is.” —Vipin Narang April 22, 2018 The Financial Times
“This was a smart move by Kim...it still leaves a lot of wiggle room for circumventing the pledges in the future, and nothing in there is irreversible...nothing in there mentions denuclearization, of any variety.” —Vipin Narang April 21, 2018 CBS/AP
“This is a very clever semantic pirouette,” he said, adding that just because North Korea had not explicitly asked for U.S. forces to leave did not mean that North Korea had not included that step as part of its demand for “ending hostilities.” —Vipin Narang April 19, 2018 Washington Post
Prof. Andrea Campbell discusses the complications of the U.S. tax system with WaPo’s John Sides and the Brookings Institute’s Venessa Williamson. April 12, 2018 John Sides The Washingon Post
“We are now beginning to change the narrative such that the families who have had that violence visited upon them now can talk about it and it be understood.” —Melissa Nobles April 9, 2018 Jim Axelrod CBS News
“The danger is entering into negotiations with unrealistic expectations that Kim is just going to hand over the keys to his nuclear kingdom. He won’t.” —Vipin Narang April 9, 2018 Monkey Cage/Washington Post
Prof. Suzanne Berger’s work cited in “What Economists Don’t Know About Manufacturing” March 29, 2018 William B. Bonvillian & Peter L. Singer The American Interest
“Kim isn’t inviting Trump to relinquish his nuclear weapons. He’s inviting him to be treated as an equal to the United States of America—a goal sought by every Kim since North Korea began its nuclear program.” —Vipin Narang March 9, 2018 The New York Times
‘Accountability Without Democracy’ February 28, 2018 The New York Times Prof. Lily Tsai's book featured in NYTimes, helps us understand why China's once-resisted trend may be turning into deliberate practice.
